This statement applies to AIDRank.com, operated by Dany Maor. It follows the model recommended by the W3C, which asks a website to state plainly where it stands rather than where it would like to be. We have written it that way. If you find it unusually blunt for a page of this kind, that is deliberate.
1. Our Commitment
We want anyone to be able to use this Website, whatever their vision, hearing, motor ability, or cognitive style, and whatever technology they use to get here. That includes screen reader users, keyboard only users, people who zoom to 200 percent or more, people who need higher contrast, and people who simply find small text hard.
We aim for the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.2 at Level AA. Aiming for something and having achieved it are two different things, and section 2 says which one we are.
2. Conformance Status
Not yet assessed
This Website has not undergone a formal accessibility audit, and we do not claim conformance with WCAG 2.2 Level AA or with any other standard. Saying otherwise would be easy and it would not be true.
We have built the site with accessibility in mind and we have added tools that help, but nobody independent has tested it, and we have not tested it comprehensively ourselves with real assistive technology. Until that happens, the honest word for our status is not assessed, and the known problems in section 5 are the ones we already know about rather than a complete list.
We would rather tell you this on the way in than have you discover it after twenty minutes of fighting with a page.
We are a one person operation. A full audit costs real money and it is on our list rather than behind us. In the meantime, this page will be updated as things get fixed, and the date at the top tells you when it was last true.
3. What We Have Done
This is what is actually in place today, not a wish list:
In place
- Semantic HTML structure with real headings, landmarks and lists
- Every interactive control is a real button or link, reachable by keyboard
- Labels on form fields and on icon only buttons
- Scores are always shown as numbers, never as colour alone
- Responsive layout that reflows on small screens and under zoom
- Modal dialogs built on a tested component library with focus handling
- Text over background chosen for contrast rather than for looks alone
Not done yet
- Independent third party audit
- Full testing with JAWS, NVDA or VoiceOver
- Text alternatives for the dashboard charts
- A published list of every issue found and fixed
- Testing with users who actually rely on assistive technology
One thing worth knowing about this Website specifically. It is text and numbers almost all the way through. There is no video, no audio, no carousel and no autoplay, which means several whole categories of accessibility problem simply do not arise here. The hard parts are the charts, and section 5 covers them.
4. The Accessibility Widget
This Website includes Sienna, an open source accessibility widget. You will find its icon on every page. Opening it gives you controls for things such as larger text, higher contrast, a dyslexia friendly font, increased spacing, highlighted links, a reading guide and a larger cursor. Your choices are stored on your device and follow you from page to page. Clicking a control again turns it off, and there is a reset.
A widget is not accessibility, and we will not pretend it is. Tools of this kind are genuinely useful if you want bigger text or stronger contrast without changing your browser settings. What they cannot do is fix underlying code. They do not add missing labels, they do not make a chart readable to a screen reader, and they do not make a broken page work. The accessibility profession is broadly clear that an overlay does not equal conformance, and we agree with it. The widget is a convenience on top of the work, not a substitute for the work.
If you use a screen reader or a magnifier of your own, you almost certainly do not need the widget and may prefer to ignore it. It is there for people who have no assistive technology set up and just need the page to be easier to read.
5. Known Limitations
These are problems we already know about. Listing them does not excuse them and we are working through them.
- Dashboard charts. The history chart is drawn on a canvas element, which a screen reader cannot read. The numbers behind it are available in the metric cards above the chart, so the information is not lost, but the chart itself is not accessible. A proper text or table alternative is planned
- Sparklines in the domain table. The small trend graphs in each row are decorative SVG with no text alternative. The score itself is next to them as a number
- The accessibility widget itself. It is a third party component and its own accessibility is outside our control. If the widget is the thing giving you trouble, tell us and we will look at replacing it
- Third party windows. Google sign in and the PayPal checkout are theirs, not ours. Their accessibility is governed by their own statements and we cannot change them
- Focus visibility. Keyboard focus is visible in most places but we have not verified every single control
- Long legal pages. Pages like this one are long. There is a table of contents on each, but no skip link to the main content yet
6. Compatibility
This Website is built to work in current versions of Chrome, Firefox, Safari and Edge, on desktop and on mobile, and it should work with the assistive technology those browsers support. It relies on JavaScript, and scanning will not work without it.
We have not tested it in older browsers, and we have not verified it against any specific screen reader version. If you use one and something breaks, that report is worth more to us than any audit, because it is real.
7. How We Assessed This
By self evaluation only, carried out by us, using automated checks and manual review. No external body has assessed this Website and no external body has approved this statement.
Self evaluation is the weakest form of assessment there is. It catches obvious problems and misses the ones that matter to real users. We are telling you the method so that you can weigh what this page is worth, which is something short of a guarantee.
8. Tell Us What Is Broken
If something on this Website does not work for you, please write to us. We read every message and we will get back to you. Reports about accessibility go to the top of the pile, because they tell us about a page that is failing someone rather than merely annoying them.
To help us reproduce it, include whatever of the following you have. Do not worry if you cannot answer all of it, a short message is better than no message:
- What you were trying to do and what happened instead
- The address of the page
- Your browser and its version
- Your operating system
- Any assistive technology you use, and its version
We will confirm we received your message within a few business days and tell you what we intend to do about it. Where we can fix something quickly we will. Where we cannot, we will say so plainly and add it to section 5 rather than let it disappear.
9. Contact Us
Accessibility issues, questions about this statement, or anything else:
AIDRank.com
Accessibility contact: Dany Maor
Operated by Dany Maor, Israel. Business ID 031454259.
Email: info@aidrank.com
Or use the form on our contact page.
This statement was prepared in July 2026 and reflects the state of the Website on that date. It will be revised when the Website changes or when an issue is fixed.